Invasion of the Danes
In the eighth century, during what is termed the Pictish period
of Scottish history, the then singularly constituted governments of
Denmark, Norway, and Sweden, produced the celebrated Pirate Kings of the
Northern Seas, called the Vikingr, perhaps unexampled in the annals of
Europe. As the Goths, the
Huns, and the Vandals, were the scourges of the human race by land, the
Pirate Kings were long the scourges of the ocean, infesting almost every
country, and plundering every vessel, which fell into their hands.
“Till the eighth century, however, “observes a learned
historian, “the Vikingr confined their odious piracies to the Baltic.
They now pursued their destructive courses on every sea and on
every pursued their destructive courses on every sea and on every shore
in Europe. They first
appeared distinctly on the east coast of England during A.D. 787.
they were felt on the Caledonian shores some years afterwards.
They made the Herbrides deplore their barbarities throughout the
ninth century, while they burned the religious houses, which the pious
hands of the Columbans (the disciples of St Columbia) had built.
In A.D. 839, the Vikingr landed among the Picts.
Uen the King hastened to defend the people.
A bloody conflict ensued, and the gallant Uen fell in defending
his country against those ferocious invaders; with him also fell his
only brother Bran, and many of the Pictish chiefs.”
The old chroniclers as ravaging the country lying between the
Picts and the Strathclyde Britons in A.D. 875 mention a Danish leader
named Halfdene. The Vikingr
had previously settled on the Irish shores, and thence found an easy
passage into the Firth of Clyde. In
A.D. 870, the Vikingr had besieged Aldcluyd, which they took and
plundered after a blockade of four months.
Aldcluyd signifies in the ancient British language the rocky
height on the Clyde, and was applied to the celebrated conical rock on
which the castle of Dumbarton is built.
During the year in which the vale of the Clyde was ravaged by
Half year in which Halfdene ravaged the vale of the Clyde, the Vikingr
sailed from Northumberland and wasted Galloway.
So severe did the inhabitants feel their inroads, that they
resolved to emigrate to Wales, and in A.D. 870, a large boy of the
departed, under a chief called Constantine, who was encountered and
slain at Lochmaben. But his
followers succeeded in repulsing the assailants, and forced their way
into Wales. There they were
assigned a district, which they defended with valour, when they assisted
the Welsh to defeat the Saxons in the battle of Cymrid.
The descendents of those Strathclyde Britons are a distinct
people in North Wales at the present time.
They inhabit Flintshire and the vale of Clyde.
According to the author of CALEDONIA, they are “distinguished
from their neighbours by a remarkable difference of person and speech.
They are a people taller, more slender, with longer visages;
their voices are smaller, and more shrill; they have many varieties of
dialect, and generally their pronunciation is less open and broad than
what is heard among the Welsh, who live to the westward of them.”
Kenneth, the son of Alpin, achieved the union and amalgamation of
the Scots and Picts, and established both people and their territories
under one government. This
enabled the Scots to offer a powerful resistance to the Pirate chief’s
f the Northern Seas. During Kenneth’s reign those Pirate chiefs landed in
Scotland, and advanced into the country as far as Clunie, in the
division of Perthshire called Stormont, and the ancient Episcopal city
of Dunkeld. Ragnar Lodbrog
was the name of the Danish leader, and the sole purpose of this invasion
was as usual plunder and blood. Of
his ravages on this occasion little is known, but he was soon afterwards
killed in Northumberland.
The Danish rovers were now yearly increasing in power, and their
settlements in Ireland were important and prosperous.
They had considerable establishment sat Waterford, and they
possessed commodious harbours on the east and north coast of the island,
at Wexford, Strangford, in Belfast Loch, and in Loch Foyle; but Dublin,
before they were driven from the city by the Irish, was the usual seat
of their power and their plunder, as it also was of their dissensions.
From these commodious stations on the north of Ireland the Danish
pirates were enabled to attack the western coasts of Scotland.
They found the river Clyde a commodious inlet into the country,
and the Moray Frith, the river Tay, and the Frith of Forth, offered
their attractive harbours on the east. The towns, such as they were in the tenth and eleventh
centuries, the residencies of the King and the chiefs, and the religious
houses, were generally the objects of their attack and plunder. In the reign of Constantine II., the son of Kenneth, in A.D.
866, the son of Kenneth, in A.D. 866, the Danes from Ireland, under a
ferocious chief named Aulaf, who had arrived in that country with a
numerous fleet and many adventurers in A.D. 753, ravaged the Scottish
coasts, and returned to their Irish retreats loaded with plunder.
The success of this expedition induced them to prepare for a
second voyage, and in A.D. 870, the Pirates sailed from Dublin for the
Clyde with augmented numbers. Their
leaders, Andd, Aulaf, and Ivar, besieged Dumbarton, which they took at
the end of four months by blockade rather than by assault.
After plundering the country they returned to Dublin in 871, with
great booty and many captives. In
A.D. 872, Aulaf led another expedition into Scotland, where he met his
fate from the hand f Constantine. Such
was now the frequency f the Danish invasions that the country was never
at rest. In A.D. 875, Ostin,
the son of Aulaf, defeated the Scots; but he did not long enjoy his
victory as he was soon afterwards treacherously slain by his own
countrymen. The Danish Pirates again invaded Scotland in A.D. 876, and
remained in the country aid bloody conflicts several months.
In A.D. 881 there was another invasion of the odious foe, and
Constantine advanced against the pirates in person.
He encountered them on the shores of the Frith of Forth, and this
ancient Scottish King fell gallantly fighting for his people.
During this disastrous inroad of the Pirates upon the coast of
Fife, several of the Scottish ecclesiastics, who had taken refuge on the
Island of May, were slain by the Pagan adventurers, for the Danish
rovers were not then converted to Christianity.
The several conflicts, which the inhabitant’s have the
southeast of Fife had to maintain, are still remembered by tradition.
Near the mansion of Lundin, in the parish of Largo, are three
remarkable stones in the middle of the plain standing upright in the
ground, each measuring eighteen feet in height, and supposed to be as
much below the surface. There
are also fragment of a fourth, which seems to have been of equal
magnitude with the other three. There
are the well-known Standing Stones of Lundin.
There is no inscription and no vestige of any ciphering is to be
found upon them. Though
they might have been erected for different purposes, and in more ancient
times, the general tradition is that they mark the graves of some Danish
chiefs who fell in battle during this invasion in the reign of
Constantine II. Skeletons in stone coffins have been found upon the shore,
from the entry of the river Leven into the Frith of forth to the eastern
extremity of Largo Bay at Kincraig Point, and there are also supposed to
be the remains of the slain. The
scene of the death of Constantine is still pointed out near Crail, at
the very south-eastern extremity of the county from which it would
appear that a kind f running fight had commenced in the parish of Largo,
and that the Danish rovers had been driven back to their galleys near
Fifeness. In a cave near
the site of the old mansion of Bacomie, the King, who was taken prisoner
in a skirmish, as the rovers retreated, is said to have been sacrificed
to the manes of the Danish leaders.
Nor must the Danes dyke, as it is still called, near the cave, be
forgotten. It sit he
remains of a bulwark of dry stones raised in one night by the Danes
after their defeat at the mouth of the Leven, when they retired to the
extreme point of Fife, which they fortified in this manner to defend
themselves against the Scots, until they could safely embark in their
galleys, which were hovering in the Frith of Forth.
The mound is quite overgrown with grass, but it can be distinctly
traced a considerable distance. Such
is the testimony of tradition the large space that it encloses, and some
other circumstances, might justify some degree of scepticism on the
subject.
In the reign of Donald IV the son of Constantine, the north men
again invaded Scotland, and, landing in the Tay, they advanced up the
river with the intention of invading either Forteviot or Dunkeld. The King met the Pirates in the neighbourhood of Scone, and a
bloody battle ensued in which the Scots were victorious.
But this defeat nothing disheartened the Danish rovers.
In A.D. 904, they again appeared in Scotland on the western coast
under Ivar O’Ivar, and penetrated into the country eastward, with a
view f plundering Dunkeld, then a royal residence of the Scottish, as it
had formerly been of the Pictish kings.
They were encountered in their progress by Donald, and were
defeated with the loss of their leader, but the King himself was in a
while gallantly defending his harassed people.
The reign of Donald’s successor, Constantine III, is noted for
a fierce invasion of the Danish pirates from Ireland.
In A.D. 907, they made a general ravage, and advanced as far as
Dunkeld, which they plundered before they could be opposed by
Constantine. But the King,
the chiefs, ad a gallant people, attacked them in an attempt against
forteviot, and drove the from the country.
This defeat secured peace several years, but in A.D. 918,
according to the Annals of Ulster, another and most formidable invasion
was made from Ireland by the Danes under Reginald their king, who
steered his fleet into the Clyde. Constantine summoned his forces to repel the Pirates, and
assisted, it is said, by some of the Northern Saxons, or inhabitants of
Northumberland, he gave battle to the Danes at a place called Tinmore,
the precise locality of which is uncertain.
The rovers arrayed themselves in four divisions-the first
conducted by Godfrey O’Ivar, the second and third by sundry earls and
chiefs, the fourth by Reginald in person; and as the division was the
reserve, he appears to have placed it in ambush.
The divisions were unable to withstand the assault of the Scots,
which was well directed by Constantine, and the amuscade was
unsuccessful. The Pirates
retreated during the night, and left the field in possession of the
Scots, whose victory was the more important, as no leader or person of
distinction on their side was slain, while two Danish chiefs, Otter and
Gragava, are mentioned as having fallen in this battle.
They commanded a party of whom the Scots made great havoc.
Reginald, the king or ruler of the Irish Danes, was induced to
conduct the Vikingr, Sitric and Godfrey to the shores of Cowal, a
peninsula or point of land stretching between the Frith of Clyde and
Lochfine. In A.D. 921 he was slain, and was succeeded by his brother
Godfrey, who is traditionally said to have been infamous for his cruelty
even among the ferocious Vikingr.
In the reign of Kenneth III was fought the battle of Luncarty, as
related in a previous narrative. Various
other invasions were made on the east and west coast of Scotland, and
these Pirates kept the country in a state of distraction.
Malcolm II the son of Kenneth III, and the third king in
succession after him, contrived to turn into distant channels the
devastations of the Danes, who had now deluged England with blood; yet
parties of them still continued to roam through the Northern Seas, and
plunder every shore. They
seized in the reign of Malcolm the burgh head of Moray, where they found
a commodious harbour and a secure retreat.
The ferocious Vikingr ravaged the Orkney’s Shetland, and the
Hebrides,, but it was near the coasts of the Moray Frith that the Danes
and Norwegians collected plunder from a wide extent of country.
Sigurd, Earl of Orkney, one of the Vikingr, carried n his
depredations along the shores of this Frith in the end of the tenth and
beginning of the eleventh century.
He married the daughter f Malcolm, but this was not restraint
upon his piracies, and in the eyes of a Vikingr friends and foes were
equally the objects of his plunder.
In A.D. 1009, the Danes made a fierce descent upon them province
of moray, and in 1010 they were met in the midst of their destructive
ravages by Malcolm at Forres. According
to tradition, Sueno, son of Harold, king of Denmark, having defeated the
English, and driven Ethelred their king out of the kingdom, resolved to
revenge themselves on the Scots, who had aided their southern neighbours.
Sueno sent a considerable force into Scotland under Olaus and
Enecus, who landed in moray, and committed great ravages. Malcolm marched against them, and a battle ensued near the
royal burgh of Forres, but the inexperienced Scotts, rushing with more
courage than prudence, rendered the victory easy to the Danes, who
followed it up by cruelty and bloodshed.
The castles of Forces, Elgin, and Nairo, were soon reduced, and
they resolved to colonise and possess the province they had conquered.
When their families arrived they fortified the promontory already
mentioned, under the name of the burgh head of Moray.
This promontory, designated by our old historians Burgus, is in
the parish of Duffus, and juts out into the Moray Frith, rising about
sixteen yards above low water. It
is a perpendicular rock on the west and north; on the east the ascent is
steep, and covered with grass; on the south the ascent is easy.
The surface is upwards of one hundred yards in length, and in
breadth about thirty. This
area they surrounded with a strong rampart of oak lay deep in the
ground, of which pieces have often been dug up, and some remains are
still visible. By cutting a trench they brought the sea round the promontory
and rendered the while secure by ramparts ad other fortifications.
This fort was intended as a place of arms, for a safe retreat if
defeated, and for an asylum to their wives and children; and it guarded
the harbour at the base of the rocks where their galleys were moored.
The Danes gave it the name of Burgh, which it still remains, and
is called the Burgh Sea, or surrounded, by the sea, but it is no longer
an artificial island.
Though defeated at Forres, the Scots were resolved never to allow
the Danes a permanent footing in the country.
Malcolm raised a powerful army in the southern countries, and in
A.D. 1010, he marched to expel the invaders.
The Danes, who had certain intelligence of the King’s motions,
moved to meet him, wisely choosing to fight him at some distance from
their projected settlement. In
the neighbourhood of a house called Carron there are vestiges of a camp,
which, it is thought, was occupied by the Pirates till their scouts
informed them of their king’s approach.
They then marched to Mortlach in Banffshire, while the Scots
approached Achindun, little more than two miles from the enemy.
The king is alleged to have used a stratagem by damming up the
rivulet of Dullan, on both sides of which the Danes lay.
About a mile above the church of Mortlach the rivulet runs in
narrow channel between high rocks.
Here its course was stopped and made to flow back into a plain,
the Scots having attacked the enemy about daybreak, the dam was ordered
to be broken up, and the torrent separated the two parts of the Danish
army, so that the one could not assist the other, and those on the
south, who were the smaller number, were all cut off.
But whatever credit may e assigned to this stratagem, the armies
first saw each other near the parish church of Mortlach, and a little to
the north of it they engaged. The
numbers of the contending parties are not stated, but a fierce and
bloody conflict ensued. Art
the commencement of the attack, while pushing forward with too ardent
impetuosity, Kenneth, Thane of the Isles, Dunbar, Thane of Lothian, and
Graeme, Thane of Stratherne, were slain, and the loss of those leaders
struck the Scots with consternation.
The contest was now less than doubtful, for the Scots were thrown
into confusion, and the issue was too likely to e decisive on the part
of the Danes. Malcolm was
carried reluctantly along with the retreating crowd, till he was
opposite the church, than a chapel dedicated to a holy saint who was
distinguished by the name of Molocus.
The passage being here narrow, the returning Scots had leisure to
recover, and were all collected together.
At this crisis Malcolm was seized with a devotional impulse, when
his eye rested on the walls of the chapel dedicated to the holy saint.
Fervently praying and as was the custom of those times, rendering
homage to the Virgin Mary and the saint, he made a particular vow that
if successful he would erect a religious edifice, to evince his
gratitude to Heaven. Inspired
with confidence he addressed his soldiers in an animated speech, and
leadings them to the attack; he struck down the Danish leader, Enecus
with his own hand, and killed him.
The Scots renewed the charge with vigour, and the northmen, after
defending themselves with their usual obstinacy of valour, were obliged
to yield the bloody contest to the bravery of their assailants.
This second and decisive conflict after rallying happened a few
hundred yards to the southwest of the Castle of Balveny, and it is
conjectured that the ancient part of that building was the in existence,
as a fort is mentioned near the field of battle.
Malcolm, in gratitude for his victory, founded the bishopric of
Mortlach, which was confirmed by Pope Benedict, who filled the
Pontifical chair from A.D. 1012 to A.D. 1024.
An ecclesiastic named Bein was consecrated the first Bishop, who
died about thirty years afterwards, and his effigy, cut n stone, was
paced on the walls of the church of Mortlach.
This Episcopal seat, it is well known, was subsequently removed
to Aberdeen in A.D. 1139.
Various traditional and other memorials are preserved and pointed
out. There still remain the
vestiges of an encampment, very distinct, on the summit of the little
Conval hill, and known in the neighbourhood as the Danish Camp. Numbers
of tumuli or Cairns exist, supposed to have covered the bodies of the
slain. A huge round stone now rolled a little distance fro its
position over the sepulchre formerly, it is said, distinguished the
grave of Enecus. It has
received the eccentric soubriquet of the Aquavitoe Stone.
“To account for this, “ quaintly observes the author of the
Statistical Account of Mortlach, “and to prevent antiquarians from
puzzling their brains with dark and learned hypothesis in time to come,
it may not be improper to tell, that the men whose brawny removed this
venerable tenant, finding it rather a hard piece of work, got as a
solace for their toil a pint o whisky, out of which immediately around
the stone they took a hearty dram.”
A square piece of ground is pointed out where a large pit was
dug, and multitudes of the dead were thrown into it.
This is near the northwest corner of the fir park of tomnamuid,
and about one hundred and twenty yards from the stone now mentioned.
There is a standing stone on the parish minister’s glebe,
containing some unintelligible sculpture.
Human bones, broken sabres, and pieces of military armour, have
been at different times discovered; and in ploughing the glebe about the
middle of the eighteenth century a chain of gold was discovered, which
from its antique formation is supposed to have bee worn by one of the
chiefs.
The celebrated monument called Forres Pillar is supposed to
commemorate this battle. It
is adorned with rude sculptures, now unintelligible, representing
warlike trophies and marches. A
writer indeed asks-“Why should there be erected at Forres a monument
of a battle fought more than twelve miles distant from it?”
But the answer is obvious. The
place might have been selected at the most central and convenient site
to commemorate the final dislodgement of the Danes from a district in
ancient times remarkable, as it still is, for its fertility, and of
which they contrived to maintain possession or render tributary.
Yet the traditional language of the district connects this fine
obelisk with a Danish leader called Sueno, ad it is consequently
designated King Sueno’s Stone.
The hostile invasions of the Danes were not confined to the
shores of the Moray Frith. The
coasts of Forfarshire and the district of Buchan experienced their
ravages. They were encountered and repulsed at Aberlemno in
Forfarshire, and two sculptured obelisks or pillars, one in the
churchyard and the other of the road from Brechin to Forfar, are
memorials of the conflict. These
pillars are about nine feet in height, and proportionally sunk in the
ground. One writer mentions
that in his time there were five obelisks, which were popularly known as
the Danish Stones of Aberlommy, near the two existing pillars a few
tumuli have been opened, wherein were found rudely formed stone coffins,
containing black earth and mouldering bones.
The repeated and disastrous defeats of the northmen at length
induced Sueno to send a fresh body of warriors into Scotland under the
command of Camus. Landing
on the cast of forfarshire near the village of Panbridge, the Danes
marched into the interior, but before they had advanced many miles they
were attacked and entirely defeated by the Scots.
Camus, in attempting to retreat northward, was pursued and slain
on the spot where a monumental stone, called Camus Stone, indicates the
scene of his overthrow. The
conflict in which he fell was maintained hand-to-hand, and the deadly
blow of a battle-axe cleaved the skull of Camus. Near Camus Cross a sepulchre was laid open, enclosed with
four stones, and s gigantic skeleton was dug up about A.D. 1910,
supposed to have been that of Camus, and part of the skull was cut away.
About two miles from Panbridge, in the parish of Monikie, there
is a farm steadying called Camuston, another near it is known as
Camuston Cross, and a third place is designated Camustons Den.
Al these localities are connected by tradition with the Danish
rovers. In this quarter,
near the eighth milestone from Dundee, there is a ridge of small
eminences called the Curhills, where several stone coffins have been
found. In the vicinity have
been discovered urns enclosed with broad flagstones, below which were
ashes, supposed to have been human bodies reduced to that state by fire.
But the preserving Pirates were not yet discouraged by their
losses and defeats. They
again landed on the Buchan coast of Aberdeenshire, in the parish of
Cruden, about a mile west from Slaines Castle, the family sent of the
Earl of Errol. Canute, son
of sueno, afterwards the celebrated king of England, commanded the
Danes. Denmark, Norway, and
part of Sweden. The
contending armies met upon a plain in the bottom of the Bay of
Ardendraught near which the Danes had then a castle, some remains of
which are still visible. A
considerable portion of the Earl of Errol’s estate is called the
Barony of Ardendraught, a name said to signify the Old Danish Camp.
Even the name of the parish, Cruden of Crudane, originated from
this battle. The Pirates
were overthrown, and on the morning after the battle, while both parties
lay at a small distance from each other, the appearances of the field
turned their thoughts from war to peace.
Conditions were proposed and accepted, which were-that the Danes
and Norwegians should withdraw themselves from Scotland-that during the
lives of the kings, Malcolm ad Sueno, all hostilities were to cease-that
the field of battle should be consecrated, and made a burying place for
the dead-and that the Danes, as well as the Scots, who had fallen in the
conflict, should be honourably interred in it.
Malcolm and Canute swore to the observance f the articles, and
faithfully performed their respective obligations.
Canute and his followers left Scotland, and Malcolm not only
caused the dead bodies of the Danes to be interred with decency, but
also built a chapel on the spot, which he dedicated to Olaus the
tutelary saint of Denmark and Norway.
The village near which this capel was erected was called Croju-Dane,
or Cruden, which signifies Kill the Dane, and there is a tradition that
during the confusion f the battle the Danish military chest was
concealed near the place, but it has never yet been found.
No vestige of the chapel of St Olaus or of the village now
remains, but the locality is well known, and bones have been repeatedly
dup up in several places. I
the churchyard of Cruden which is about a mile westward from the scene
of battle, there is a black marble gravestone, said to have been sent
over by the Danish king to mark the sepulchre of some of his officers
slain in the battle.
Scotland was now freed from the invasions of the northern
Pirates, who do not appear to have ravaged the coasts until the time of
there expedition under Haco, when they were finally defeated at the
battle of Largs. Their proceedings in the Orkney and Shetland Islands, the
Hebrides, and other islands “far amid the melancholy main,” are
elsewhere narrated.
Many memorials of those celebrated Northern Pirates, and
their hostile invasions, still remain throughout Scotland. So of these
are already noticed. In the
parish of Innerwick, in the country of Haddington, there is a small
Danish encampment on Blackcastle Hill, and near it are several Cairns of
burial places. The
churchyard of Ruthwell in Dumfriesshire contains a true Danish monument,
which seems to be the only Runic remains in north Britain.
It was when entire in the form of an obelisk, and about eighteen
feet in length, the side of each square being ornamented with figures
taken from sacred history. This
curious pillar, which may have been erected by some of the followers of
Halfdene the Dane, was ordered to be dilapidated as a monument of
idolatry by the General Assembly! A
more degrading fate attended a curiously carved Danish stone in the
parish of Neilston in Renfrewshire.
It once stood on the lands of Hawkhead, but it was made a humble
bridge over a small rivulet between that property and Arthurlie.
There is also an obelisk in the Parish of Kirkden in forfarshire,
on which are represented some imperfect figures of horses, supposed to
have been erected upon the defeat of the Danes by Malcolm II about the
same time with the Cross at Camuston.
In the
Island of Lismore there is an old castle, with a fusee and drawbridge,
said to have been built by the Northern Pirates.
There are six Danish signal places in the parish of Kilmuir in
the Island of Skye, and though the Gaelic languages is principally
spoken by the inhabitants, most of the names of places in that Island
are derived from the Danish or Norwegian.
There are two ruins, called castles, of Danish forts in the
parish of Loudn in Ayrshire, one of which is surrounded by a deep ditch,
which was crossed by a drawbridge. Bracadale, in Inverness-shire, contains several Danish forts,
the outer wall of one of which is still entire, constructed of large dry
stones without mortar or any kind of cement, but very regularly and
artificially laid together. Abour
a mile from forgan in Perthshire, there is a place called Castlelaw, on
the summit of a conical hill, which was defended on all sides by a
stonewall, the vestiges of which still remain.
The general opinion is that this was a Danish fortification.
This place commands a most extensive prospect to the mouth f the
Tay on the east, all Strathearn to the Grampians on the west, a great
part of the counties of Perth and Forfar on the north and northeast, and
the top of the Lomond Hills on the south.
There are several Danish forts, or places of observation, in the
united parishes of Larbert and Dunipace in Stirlingshire particularly
one at Lambert, a second at Braes, and a third at Upper Torwood.
On the Western shores of Argyle, and in the northeastern
countries of Scotland, these memorials are numerous.
The Danes furnish the only memorials of antiquity in the parish
of Barrie in forfarshire, and these are connected with their
misfortunes. There are numerous tumuli, the traces of a camp in the
neighbourhood, and Carnoustie, or the Cairn of Heroes is the name of a
village and estate, I the vicinity of which is a rivulet, which was
coloured with blood for three days.
These tumuli are the graves of the marauders who fell in the
desperate engagement near Panbridge.
In the parish of Falkland in fife, between the towns of Falkland
and Auchtermuchty, on the south side of the Eden, there are the remains
of a Danish camp. A
neighbouring village is still called Dunshelt, supposed to be a
corruption of Danes Halt. This camp is of a circular form.
On Kaimes Hill and South Platt Hill, in the parish of Ratho, were
two Danish encampments, and the latter position was probably selected
from the extensive prospect it commands, as there is a full view of the
Forth from Stirling t the Island f May, the coasts of fife. Midlothian and Haddington, and the hills in the counties of
Perth, Stirling, and Dumbarton, as far as the “lofty Ben Lomond.”
A hieroglyphically column, which stands conspicuous on the moor
of Rhynie in Aberdeenshire, is another memorial of a conflict with the
odious Danes. At Sandwick,
in the parish of Nigg, on the east shore of Ross, there is an obelisk
with sculptures of beasts and a cross, and here, according to tradition,
three sons of a Danish king were interred.
A similar stone in the churchyard is ascribed to the Danes.
An obelisk about ten feet high, with carved figures, in the
parish of Eddeston in Ross-shire, is said to mark the place of the
interment of a Danish prince. One
of a similar description is near the parish church of Criech in the
county f Sutherland, and at the parish church of Farr, in the same
county, is a large sculptured stone, which intimates the grave of a
Danish chief who rested quietly here after all his savage deeds.
At Wick, in Caithness, there is a large stone with hieroglyphic
characters, which s said mark the grave of a Danish princess, the wife
of one of the piratical Vikingr.
In the Parish of Craignish, in the county of Argyll, they’re re
the remains of many Danish fortified eminences.
These must have been reared without lime or mortar of any kind,
and from their construction striking proofs are given of the strength
and perseverance, though none of the taste and genius, of the Pirate
invaders. Many grey stones also rear their heads in the heath, and mark
the graves of the warriors of ancient times.
A cluster of these rude obelisks is to be seen near the mansion
of Craignish, which the proprietor has allowed to stand unmolested.
Farther up the valley, towards the mountains, there was erected
of a ore than ordinary size, to distinguish the grave of a warrior who
fell in the pursuit, and remains of cairns, which covered the graves
where the ashes of the dead were deposited, are to be seen.
Tradition represents this as the locality of a bloody engagement
between the Danes and the natives, in which Olaus, a son of the King of
Denmark, was slain. Near the field of battle there is a little mount, which is
called Duncan Aula, or the Little Hill of Olaus.
During the eighteenth century, while some workmen were employed
in incising this spot, after removing some loose stones they discovered
a grave composed of four flags. A
minute inspection disclosed to them an ancient urn.
Expecting to find a treasure they broke the urn, and found
nothing but the ashes of Olaus!
In the parish of Culross there are still the remains of two
Danish camps of the usual oval form, one near a place called Burrowan,
which is said to be the retreat of the Danes after their defeat near
Inverkeithing; the other is in Culross muir, and was occupied by the
rovers before the battle near that little royal burgh.
The vicinity of the town of Cromarty contains many memorials of
the invaders, who are reputed to have sustained a severe defeat in a
large muir called Mullbuy. In
various parishes throughout the Western Highlands and the Hebrides,
Danish forts and Cairns constantly occur, the purposes of which, from
their peculiar situations, are obvious.
It would be tedious to enumerate all these monuments of
antiquity, which show the enterprising spirit of the piratical Northmen,
and the determined courage of the ancient Scottish inhabitants, who
constantly and successfully repelled the invaders from ther shores.
While England was compelled to submit for a time to the
government of a Danish prince. Scotland
preserved its independence, and the “stormy north” was the scene of
many a sanguinary conflict. These
battles are inseparably connected with the traditions of the country,
and the localities are still poited out with the utmost accuracy.
It may easily be inferred that the terror, which the invasions of
the roving Vikingr excited throughout the country, was intense, and that
it required the most desperate exertions of the ancient Scots to repel
an enemy whose career was marked by desolation and blood.
Capture of Inchkeith
Monsieur D’Esse, an experienced French commander, arrived at
Leith in 1549 with an army of six thousand men, all veteran soldiers, to
assist the Scots in their contest with England during the regency of
Mary of Lorraine, the mother of Queen Mary.
The arrival of this force is thus noticed by a poet of those
times.
At Leith
they landit in the haven,
With
powder, bullet, guns, and other geir,
Drest all
their platforms in todays seven,
Nor
lacking naething that belonged to weir.
Perceiving the importance of securing a place possessed of many
advantages, the French commander began to fortify the town by throwing
round it strong and regular works.
These consisted chiefly of a rampart of earth, and it appears to
have been a most formidable defence, constructed after the best
principles of fortification as adapted to the warfare of the times.
It is proper, however, to state that this is not the opinion of
the valiant Captain Colepepper in the Fortunes of Nigel .
“You speak of the siege of Leith,” says the redoubtable
Captain, “and I have seen the place; a pretty kind of a hamlet it is,
with a plain wall, or rampart, and a pigeon house or two of a tower at
every angle. Uds, daggers,
and scabbards! If a leaguer
of our days had been twenty-four hours, not to say so many months,
before it, without carrying the place, and al its cocklofts, one after
another, by pure storm, they would have deserved no better grace than
the Provost Marshal gives when his noose is reeved.”
But whatever may have been the state and appearance of the
fortifications at Leith; we shall delay noticing these matters for the
present, and direct our attention to Inchkeith.
This little island, which is most conspicuous in the Frith of
Forth, half way between Leith and Kinghorn, was taken possession of by
the English at this period, and fortified.
The garrison were in a situation, which afforded them many
advantages, and they committed considerable depredations on the shores
of Mid-Lothian and Fife, securing them from pursuit by returning to the
island upon any alarm, where they were out of all danger from sudden
reprisals. D’Esse
resolved to dislodge the enemy from this stronghold, and ordered
Monsieur de Biron, one of his officers, to sail out and reconnoitre the
island. There is only one easy landing being very steep on almost all
sides, and a handful of men could easily hold out against a superior
force brought against it in those times.
Monsieur de Biron embarked in a galley belonging to a French
captain named Villegaignon-the same galley, it is said, which carried
the infant Queen Mary to France from Dumbarton Castle, and sailing round
the island he carefully noted every point favourable for an attack.
The English garrison were either ignorant of his intentions, or
set him at defiance, for although he was nearly the whole time within
reach of their guns he was not only unmolested, but was able to give a
tolerably correct account of their umbers and condition, and of the
state of the works upon the island.
Mary of Lorraine had resorted often to Leith since the arrival of
her countrymen, and she took such an interest in the projected
superintended the embarkation of the soldiers selected for the attack.
The French, accompanied by some Scottish troops, sailed from
Leith Harbour in small boats, and at first endeavoured to conceal their
intentions from those on the island.
They accordingly pretended to be merely sailing up and down the
Frith, but their frequent approach to the island, where they were
evidently selecting a place to land excited the suspicious of the
garrison. Finding
themselves discovered, the assailants made directly for the rock, and
found the English prepared to dispute their attempt to land. The assailants nevertheless sprung out of their boats, and
after a severe contest they not only maintained their ground, the
English to the higher parts of the island, where their commander, named
Cotton, and George Appleby, one of his officers, were killed.
Besides those gentlemen, several persons of some note fell on the
side of the English.
The fortalice of castle, which has long disappeared, was secured
by the assailants, who pushed the Engish to an extremity of the island,
where they surrendered without farther resistance.
The gallantry the little band who attempted its defiance was most
conspicuous. They disputed
every yard of the rock with their antagonists, and only yielded when
there was no longer any chance of success.
In this assault Monsieur de Biron was wounded in the head by a
harquebus, and his helmet was so beaten about his ears it was necessary
to carry him into a boat to dress his wounds.
The pike of the English commander killed one Desbois, his
standard bearer, and Gasper Strozzi, the commander of a party of
Italians, was also slain. The fortalice of Inchkeith was kept in repair for some time,
but it was finally ordered to be dismantled by the Scottish Parliament,
to prevent it being of any farther use to be English.
There is a French account of this enterprise written in 1556,
which is not a little amusing, as it is expressed in the bombastic
language peculiar to that extraordinary nation, and is at the same time
extremely scarce. The
following is their narrative of the capture of Inchkeith abridged and
condensed. To those
familiar with the present state of the island, an account of it by an
eye witness, as it appeared in the reign of Queen Mary, during the
Regency of her mother, must be entertaining and curious.
“The Island of Inchkeith, upon its being recovered from the
English was named by the Queen Dowager the Island of God, but formerly
the French called it the Island for Horses, and the reason was because
hitherto it had been thought useless to men, and remained uninhabited.
Yet Inchkeith is not destitute of the blessings of nature; it is
pretty large, possesses excellent water, has spots of ground fit to be
converted into pasturage or gardens, and places proper for saltpans and
harbours. Its inhabitants
at a small charge might make lime; build houses, and fortifications of
all sorts. The island is so advantageously situated in the midst of the
Frith of Forth, that it commands the sips that sail to or from the
better part of the kingdom. Nature
itself has fortified it, for the access is so difficult that it cannot
be come at except by three fit places, and in these the sea, which is
intermixed with the river, is about a foot and a half in depth.
Hence, on account of the rocks, obvious at all times to the eye,
no sort of shipping can come near the island, and one must set foot upon
these huge stones, jump from one to another, and so gain the island,
unless he chose to wade, n which case he would be in danger of falling
unawares into one of those deep and narrow pools which are within a
short distance of the island between the rocks.
On all sides nothing is seen but a continued precipice, only
towards the west nature has carved out steps, which ascend to the height
of about twenty French fathoms, but there is little possibility of
getting up by these means. Thus
the island is very strong and advantageously situated, and besides the
above impediments, the paths leading to the banks are so very narrow,
widening, and steep, that scarcely three men can walk abreast, while the
whole is commanded by the summit, on which the English had built a
square fort, and had made it tenable within less than fifteen days.
“Not long before the English fleet came up the Frith, the Queen
was informed that Monsieur de Termes had arrived at Dumbarton with two
hundred horse, one hundred men-at-arms, and one thousand foot, and that
he was appointed to the command of his Majesty’s (the King of France)
army in Scotland in the room of Monsieur D’Esse.
These accounts added to the desire the latter felt to obtain
possession of the island. The
Queen Dowager, on her part, sensible how prejudicial the presence of the
English was to the kingdom, used every exertion to keep the French
officers close to their resolution to attempt te recovery of the island.
But this was, as the proverb express it, to set the spurs to a
courser for the whole of them were bent upon the thing, and in
compliance with her Majesty’s suggestion, it was resolved to send a
man of prudence to view the fortifications commenced by the enemy.
Monsieur Chapelle de biron was singled out on account of his
great experience for the purpose, who together with Messieurs De Dussac,
De Ferrieres, De Gourdes, and Nicolas, went onboard a small frigate
commanded by M. De Villegaignon, sailed round the island, and returned
with an exact account of the outward appearance of the works, the
numbers, and the state of the garrison.
“The reports made by these gentlemen to her Majesty
considerably affected her, for she saw that a post of such importance
could not be easily recovered, but she had the prudence to conceal her
sentiments, and gravely and civilly intimated to us her anxiety on the
subject, and the value she would hold our services in the enterprise.
All those who had served under Monsieur D’ Esse, solicitous
that the attempt should be made by them exclusively, were informed of
the design, but no of the day fixed for putting it into execution.
This was politic, for if the English had by any means got
information, they would have summoned to their assistance twenty ships
of war, waiting at Eyemouth for a fair wind to carry them to Calais.
“Messieurs D; Esse, De Termes, Biron, and Villegaignon, had
taken the measures connected with their respective duties, and other
officers had been active in prevailing upon the Scots to bring into the
harbour of Leith all boats found lying in the neighbouring creeks and
havens. The Queen pressed
the immediate execution of the Vens.
The Queen pressed the immediate execution of the project, and
came to Leith on corpus Christi Day, that her presence might prevent any
quarrelling abut the choice of the boats, and encourage the soldiers to
their duty. As they saluted
her before they entered the boats, she addressed them as follows.
You are obliged, my good friends, to the favour of Heaven, who
has endowed you with courage, and afforded you so many honourable
occasions to evince it. If
I doubted the ascendant you will gain over the enemy, I would forget
that you are Frenchmen. As
such, you have a natural right to vanquish the English, and have kept
yourselves in possession of that glorious privilege since you came
hither. Continue, then,
brave soldiers and my very good friends to overcome.
Remember that God is propitious t this kingdom, and that he has
sent you from France to preserve Scotland.
“Te soldiers, animated by these expressions, and fond of
serving her Majesty in any circumstances, unanimously took Heaven to
witness that they went off with a determined resolution to conquer or
perish. It is now new thing
to see a few soldiers so nobly disposed, but it is not a little
remarkable to see some hundreds thus influenced.
The Queen, overjoyed at their enthusiasm, asked Monsieur D’
Esse, when stepping onboard his ship, how many soldiers he had with him
in this expedition? ‘Madam,’ he replied, ‘I do not precisely know
their numbers, but this I certainly know, that your Majesty may depend
upon their courage.’ ‘The
wise,’ replied the Queen, ‘are seldom disappointed in their
expectations, and since you’ as well as those under your command,
promise so fair, I cannot doubt that you will come off with victory.
The event of al things, Madam,’ he rejoined, ‘is in the hand
of God, yet thus much I declare, that if yon island is not regained this
day, D’ Esse shall never again unsheathe a sword.
These words I overheard, and some more, but not so distinct as to
enable me to set them down.
“The ships or galleys, commanded by Villegaignon and De Seur,
had in the meantime sailed to prevent the English from coming out of the
fortress to dispute the landing, and now all the boats made to the
island. We had to contend with a violent gale on the way, and during
this the enemy having observed us, stationed their Italian harquebusiers
and some English bowmen to deter us from landing.
The rest of their forces they divided into two bodies, placing
the one within the front they had begun to build, and the other without,
at the distance of forty paces, so far as we could judge from our boats.
The Italians were drawn up towards the east of the island, where
a part of the land descends towards the sea, which they considered to e
almost inaccessible, and for that reason they had not fortified it.
When they were approaching the island Monsieur D’ Esse sailed
from boat to boat, exhorting his men to courage and resolution.
Comrades he exclaimed, only follow me, and you will know were
long that it is not the place on which men fight, but the resolution
with which they handle their arms, that wins the day.
“While Monsieur D’ Esse was speaking, and about a dozen of
boats were sailing by his side, he approached within reach of the stones
and arrows of the enemy, who did him all the mischief in their power.
He ran his vessel against one f the rocks, which are discoverable
only at low water, and thus his progress was for a time interrupted; but
monsieur Biron gained the eastern point of the island, near which the
Italians were stationed. He
secured the advantage of a rock, which the ebbing tide had abandoned,
and there with some gentlemen kept his position, until three or four
boats, which followed him, landed their soldiers, who beat off the
Italians to the summit of the island.
Monsieur D’Esse and several officers also affected a landing,
but they had to contend with the step declivities of the rock before
they could reach a convenient place to attempt the summit, where the
English and their Italian auxiliaries were now joined.
While Monsieur Biron was advancing and gaining ground upon the
enemy, he was wounded by the shot f a harquebus, and a part of his
helmet was driven into his head. When
his followers saw the blood copiously flowing, they urged him to leave
the contest, but he exclaimed. Since
it is impossible that I can be preserved to die on a more honourable
occasion, I entreat you, gentlemen, not to deprive me of the pleasure of
either falling on the spot, or of sharing with you the glory of the day.
He became, however, so weak with the loss of blood that it was
necessary to convey him onboard one of the galleys, and commit hi to
care of his followers.
“The English had many advantages over us.
They occupied a position thought inaccessible; they had supplied
by art what was wanting by nature towards their defence; and they were
more numerous within the island than we who attacked them, tired as we
were by both the fatigue at sea and the difficulties, which we
encountered at landing. To
do the enemy justice, they made excellent use for a long time of there
advantages, fought most obstinately against both Germans and French, and
exposed themselves to infinite danger when we attempted to land, and
afterwards when we made the ascent. They had the boldness to wait, and they wanted courage to
sustain the charge. Yet an
officer, along others, who for his skill in military affairs was very
much esteemed by the King of England, found out a thousand means to
plague us from a favourable position he contrived to occupy.
This man was going from rank to rank, ordering some to fire, and
others t advance, sometimes planting his guns and discharging them
himself, when his head was carried off by a cannon ball from one of our
galleys. The English did
wonders as long as they had advantage of ground, but when they perceived
that we gave up attempting the narrow paths and defiles, to come to a
part of the island which contracts into a plain, they stood close
together in a disorderly manner. One
of them wishing to stimulate hiss countrymen, advanced against us waving
a pair of colours, but he was killed by a shot, and the colours were
taken amid the loud cheers of our men.
“We were about two hundred altogether in this
place, and though we attacked the enemy with all the valour imaginable,
yet we could not injure them except with our shot. The English commander, active as he was-for the truth is, he
advanced at the head of his small battalion with great resolution-soon
found himself surrounded with heaps of slain, but this did not restrain
his ardour. On the
contrary, he continued to advance and lay about him most desperately.
A gentleman named Desboryes, an ensign in Monsieur biron’s
company, made up to ho sword in hand, but the English commander, having
the advantage of a long pike, thrust it into his neck, and made way for
his soul to get out of his frail body.
“By this time all our men were landed, and Monsieur D’ Esse
with his soldiers had come to close quarters with the enemy.
The English commander fell covered with wounds, and his men made
a disorderly retreat to the part of the island where they surrendered.
Our numbers amounted to seven hundred, and with the loss of three
we made ourselves master of the island, defended by eight hundred
English trained to war, and accustomed to slaughter.
We found on it a number of large and small guns, ammunition of
all sorts, a quantity of warlike implements, and tools for carrying on
the fortifications, besides Spanish wine, bedding, silk stuffs, woollen
cloths, and other necessaries. Monsieur
D’ Esse absolutely refused to share in the booty, declaring that he
would never appropriate to himself the property of soldiers, and that he
intended to return to France enriched only with honour.”
When the day dawned, two English ships and a boat were descried
approaching the island to supply the garrison with provisions.
One of the vessels was just nearing the island, and a French
officer named St Andre, who had been left in command, exerted himself to
decoy the crew, when by some means they discovered that their countrymen
had been defeated, and they stood out to sea.
St Andre discharged some guns at the vessels, but no injury was
done. On the same day the
Queen Dowager sailed to Inchkeith, and landed, with the greatest
satisfaction at the result of the enterprise.
According to the French account, she beheld between three hundred
and four hundred of the slain lying undeterred.
In an interview with St. Andre, she said-“Well, Captain, is it
in the power of the enemy to retake this island with as much dexterity
as we have forced if from them?”
“No, by Heaven, Madam!” replied the enthusiastic Frenchman,
“the island of Inchkeith has much better ramparts today than it had
yesterday.” When Monclue,
bishop of Valence, who accompanied the Queen dowager to Inchkeith,
advised the completion of the fortifications commenced by the English,
St. Andre replied. “My
Lord, the better we are fortified we shall certainly be so much more
invincible, and if the enemy offer any interruption these brave men”
pointing to the soldiers, “will not fail to make ramparts of there
arms and hearts.”
Siege of Broughty Castle
Three miles east from Dundee, on the banks of the Frith of Tay,
is the agreeable and pleasant village of Broughty Ferry-a modern sea
bathing retreat of the lieges of the county of Forfar, and similar to
those watering places patronised by the citizens of Edinburgh and
Glasgow during the summer months. Although
Broughty Ferry is minus trees, and has no pretensions to romantic
environs, being situated like the Portobello of the Modern Athenians, on
leve ground, it is nevertheless a comfortable, pleasant and sunny
village, with a delightful beach, and separates from the opposite shore
of Fife little more than a mile. The only object of historical interest in this village is the
old ruined Castle Broughty, prominently situated on elevated rocks, and
rearing its venerable battlements as if in proud disdain of the
surrounding series of villas and houses.
When it was built, or by whom, is not ascertained, and the
earliest notice of it is in 1492, when Boece mentions it as witnessing a
foolish prodigy. From 1547 to 1550, Broughty Castle was the scene of exploits
worthy of notice, and which are intimately connected with important
events in Scottish history.
The Duke of Somerset invaded Scotland in 1547, and after gaining
the important battle of Pinkie, although compelled to return to England
onaccount of designs formed against him, his fleet continued to scout
the Scottish coasts, and, with the fortresses on the islands of the
Frith of Forth,the English seized the Castle of Broughty, and filled it
with a sufficient garrison. While
the Duke of Somerset departed with his army by the southeast of
Scotland, the Earl of Lennox, who had been received with distinction by
Henry VIII and honoured with his alliance, entered the kingdom by the
west, and his presence everywhere spread terror.
The Regent Arran, at all times timid, beheld this new rival with
dismay, but to conceal his fear he collected the scattered remains of
the Scottish army discomfited at Pinkie, and marched to blockade the
Castle of Broughty. He lay
before the fortalice from the 1st of October 1547 to the 1st
of January, when he was obliged to raise the siege, with the loss of all
his ordnance. The English,
emboldened by their success, pillaged Dundee and other places, and
fortified the hill of Balgillo, nearly a mile northward of Broughty,
where some vestiges of their fortifications are still to be seen.
When the Earl of Argyll was informed that the English were
ravaging the county of Forfar, and defeating every attempt at opposing
them on the past of Maule of Panmure, and Halyburton, Provost of Dundee,
he collected his vassals, and marched to Broughty, but he was no more
fortunate than the Regent, and was compelled to relinquish the siege.
A similar fate attended three regiments of French commanded by
Monsieur D’ Esse, but at length the fortress was yielded in 1550 to
the allied army f Scots, French, and Germans, commanded by Des Thermes,
the successor of D’ Esse. A
narrative if this siege, written by M. Beaugue, was published at Paris
in 1556. It contains some
curious particulars not generally known.
After some server reflections on Lord Gray, a Scottish nobleman
who was most conspicuous in those times for his venality, and to whom it
stated Broughty Castle then belonged, Monsieur Beaugue says “Broughty
is a castle so conveniently situated that at full tide ships of 150 tons
may ride at anchor within a hundred or eighty paces of it.
The Earl of Arran had already made two attempts to recover this
place, and both times he employed at least eight thousand men and eight
pieces of cannon, but he failed in the first, because his presence was
most urgently required elsewhere; and as for the second, the Earl of
Argyll, who commanded the siege, made a truce with the garrison for a
set time, and before its expiry the English had sent such succours as
compelled him to retire, after his Highlanders had lain before it as
long as they were obliged to serve.
“Monsieur D’Esse, being informed of the state of affairs at
Broughty, sent Count Rimgrave with his companies of Germans, and
Monsieur D’ Etauges with one of French, following with the remainder
of his forces in person with the greatest expedition.
The enterprise was projected and conducted with all imaginable
secrecy and prudence, but it was not possible to conceal those movements
from the English, who, when informed that we intended to visit them,
demolished the fortifications they had commenced and diligently carried
on during the space of eight days at Dundee, rifled the houses, and set
fire to the town, returning to their forts at Broughty and Balgillo
Hill. They were fortunate
to have faithful spies in their interest on this occasion, for Count
Rimgrave and Monsieur D’Etauges had gone before with a design of
giving employment to the enemy; but when they entered Dundee they had
the mortification to find in the town only a few men and some poor
women, who were exerting themselves to extinguish the flames kindled by
the English.
“Two days after this disappointment, the officers now mentioned
went at the head of their companies to view the new fortress built by
the English at Broughty. They
advanced so very near it, that those within must either have drawn out,
or allowed them to be braved at the foot of their walls.
They chose to sally out, and we had a very warm reencounter.
Our Germans drove back the foremost to their fort, and there met
with the strength of their forces, who received our men within reach of
the ordinance of the place; yet our captains and soldiers repulsed them
again and again, till seeing a proper time they retired towards Dundee,
facing about when necessary, and observing to a nicety all the
punctilios of honour required on such occasions.
“After the various undertakings and successes of the campaign.
Monsieur D’Esse ordered Dundee to be fortified, to prevent the
English getting any more footing in those parts of the kingdom.
For which purpose he left seven companies of French and two of
Scots in the place, with pioneers, cannon, and other necessary
ammunition. He then
returned to Edinburgh, and it being necessary to give some case to his
fatigued soldiers, he sent the residue of the army to quarter in the
towns of St. Andrews, Perth, Aberdeen, Montrose, and in somre villages
of the county of Fife.
“Monsieur D’ Etauges was commander of the garrison of Dundee,
which consisted of his own company of horse all very well mounted and
armed, seven companies of French infantry and two of Scots, the one of
foot and the other of horse. All
these had made frequent attempts upon the English at Broughty, and
knowing how to improve an advantage, and to nick an opportunity, they
always had the advantage of them. By
this means the enemy were brought to that pass that they durst not stir
abroad, or if they did, they were sure to keep always within the reach
of an harquebus of their own walls.
On this account Monsieur D’ Etauges so much undervalued them,
that one day he resolved to go with a very few attendants to see a small
vessel which was cast away at Broughty. He put on a coat of Spanish leather, and armed only with his
sword and dagger, he mounted a very fine Turkish horse, desiring seven
or eight gentlemen of his own retinue to follow him, and take the air
and pleasure of the fields for a few hours.
But Beauchatel, who was near him at the time, thought fit to play
a sure game. He caused
about twenty-five of our men to arm, and rode after his commander at
full speed. The English had already discovered Monsieur D’ Etanges.
That entire tract which lies between Dundee and Broughty is a
large plain; the way is marshy, and deep and uneasy during the winter.
The garrison had no sooner descried Monsieur D’ Etauges
proceeding along the road from Dundee than they began to discharge their
cannon. This did not
prevent monsieur D’ Etauges from going round the forts, and viewing it
on all sides, as here had often done before.
This induced the English to sally out upon him.
Beauchatel and his twenty-five horsemen, all barve lusty fellows
joined him. Ashe was
himself about to charge the enemy a second time, his horse, wheeling
about in a marshy place, fell on his right side.
Being surrounded by the English he was made prisoner, who carried
him off immediately to their fort.”
The English retained possession of Broughty Castle till expelled,
as already stated, by a united force of the Scots, French, and Germans,
under Monsieur Des Thermes, the successor of D’Esse.
The castle was afterwards dismantled, and though occasionally
repaired it was eventually permitted to become a ruin, in which
condition it now exists, and is a prominent object when entering the Tay,
as if surveying with indifference the mighty changes, which have
completely, altered the appearance of the surrounding country.
Dundee is now a large and populous seaport, the land between it
and Broughty is finely cultivated, instead of being
a marsh as it was in Queen Mary’s time, and Broughty is a
pleasant village, the inhabitants of which live in peaceful seclusion,
enlivened, and of course enriched, by the presence of those summer
visitors who resort to it for health and retirement.
Battle of the Grampians
The proceedings of the Romans in Britain, and particularly in
Scotland, the battles they fought, and the many interesting memorials
still to be seen, in various parts of the country, of those ancient
masters of the world, require a connected and distinct narrative; but
the celebrated battle of the Grampians, which was the last of those
series of successes, may with propriety to be given separate, as the
final triumph of Roman discipline over savage clans of roving
barbarians, whose dispositions were as untameable as their lives were
wild and ferocious.
Cnaeus Julius Agricola spent about seven or eight years in
Britain, from A.D. 76 to A.D. 84 or 85, but the precise year of his
arrival id not ascertained. The
campaigns of every year added to the Roman arms, and at the end of the
fourth campaign the Shole iIsland south of the Forth and Clyde were
secured by the well-known wall, parts of which still remain, and by a
chain of forts. It was in
the last year of his government that Agricola defeated Galgacus on the
Grampian mountains, and after this victorious conclusion of the
campaign, a Roman fleet sailed round the entire island, and marked the
boundary of the empire in the region of the Ultima Thule, and the
Hebridean islands, lying “far amid the melancholy main.”
It appears from Tacitus that in the course of the third campaign,
in A.D. 80, the Romans extended their conquests north of the Frith of
Tay, and subdued the counties of fife and Perth.
The principals fort built by Agricola was at Ardoch in the latter
county, situated so as to command this entrance into the extensive
valleys of Strathallan and Strathearn, and the choice of it proves what
Tacitus says, that no general showed greater skill I the choice of
advantageous situations. The
Caledonians, as the Scots are called, retreated before the veteran
Romans, and never dared to hazard a battle, although the legions
struggled with all the difficulties of a tempestuous season.
At every Roman post provisions for twelve month were supplied, to
enable the garrison to stand a siege.
They were repeatedly assailed during the winter, but they beat
the besiegers in repeated sallies, and passed that winter secure from
danger. “The
consequence,” says Tacitus, “of these precautions was, that the
enemy, who had been accustomed to retrieve in the winter what they had
lost in the preceding summer, saw no difference of seasons, and as they
defeated everywhere, they were reduced to despair.”
Yet the country had been overrun, not conquered, and the business
of the fourth campaign was to secure it from native aggression. It was then that Agricola constructed his line of forts
between the Friths of Forth and of Clyde, the same isthmus or neck of
land on which Lollius Urbicus, governor of Britain, in the reign of
Antoninus Pius, erected the Roman wall usually called Graham’s Dyke.
By means of these wall situated and guarded stations, the
Caledonians were confined to the northern part of Scotland, as it were
in a peninsula. Agricola’s
fifth campaign was in A.D. 82, and he penetrated farther into Scotland,
but from the obscure style of Tacitus in this part of his life of
Agricola, it is difficult to ascertain on which side the attempt was
made. It appears, however,
from the sequel, that the Roman general, having driven the Caledonians
beyond the isthmus between the Clyde and the Forth, resolved to march
against the tribes and septs north of the Clyde, to spread a general
alarm, and make an impression on the western side of the country.
He accordingly crossed the river Clyde in the first Roman vessel
ever seen in that river, and landed near Dumbarton, while his army
advanced by land, and making a rapid progress through the county of
Argyle, marched to the sea coast opposite to Ireland.
Tacitus says that Agricola defeated the Caledonians in several
engagements before he came to the sea coast, which he induced to do not
so much from an apprehension of danger, as with a view to future
prospects. He saw that
Ireland, lying between Britain and Spain, and at the same time
convenient to the ports of Gaul and France, might prove a valuable
acquisition, capable of giving an easy communication, and of course
strength and union, to provinces disjoined by nature.
The Roman general, and detained under a show of friendship, to be
of use on some future occasion, kindly received an Irish petty king, who
had been forced to fly from the fury of a domestic faction.
In the campaign of the sixth summer, dreading a confederacy of
the tribes beyond the Frith of Forth, and also afraid of the danger of
being surprised in a country not yet explored, Agricola ordered his
ships to cross to Fife, and obtain some knowledge of the districts. He
had already in the third year of his expedition penetrated north of the
forth as far as the Firth of Tay, but that district was merely overrun,
and now, suspecting an insurrection beyond the Forth, he manned a fleet
to search the coasts on the northeast of Scotland.
An antiquarian writer is of opinion, since Tacitus of the return
of those ships takes no notice, that after their survey of the coast
they remained in some road or harbour on the coast of Fife, or within
the Frith of Tay, where there was commodious shelter from tempestuous
weather. The war was now
carried on in the counties of Fife, Peth, and the Mearns. The Roman fleet, Tacitus, now acting for the first time in
concert with the land forces, proceeding in sight of the army, forming a
magnificent spectacle, and adding terror to the war, tells us. At the sight of the Roman fleet, the natives, according to
the statements of the prisoners, were struck with consternation,
convinced that every resource was not cut off, since the sea, which had
always afforded them shelter was now laid open to the invaders.
The Caledonians in their distress resolved to try the issue of a
battle. Without waiting for
the commencement of hostilities they stormed the Roman forts and
castles, traces of which still exist in the countries of Fife and Perth,
and made such an impression that several of Agricola’s officers, under
the specious appearance of prudent counsels, advised a retreat, to avoid
the disgrace of being driven back to the other side of the Frith of
Forth. This recommendation
was disregarded by Agricola, who having received intelligence that the
enemy meditated an attack in various quarters at once, and lest superior
numbers, in a country where he was a stranger to the defiles and passes,
should be able to surround him, he divided his army, and marched forward
in thee columns.
The Caledonians, when informed of this arrangement, changed their
plans, and in middle of the night fell with their united force upon the
ninth legion, which was considered the weakest in the Roman army.
They surprised the advanced guard, put the sentinels to the
sword, and forced their way through the entrenchments amid the terror
and consternation, which prevailed.
The battle raged in the very camp, when Agricola, who had been
informed that the Caledonian were on the march, instantly pursued, and
came opportunely up to the relief of the legion.
Ordering the swiftest of the horse and light infantry to advance
and charge the assailants in the rear, his whole army raised a loud
shout. At break of day the
Caledonians beheld the Roman eagles and banners glittering before them,
and found themselves hemmed in by two armies.
Their vigour relaxed at this unexpected misfortune, while the
courage of the ninth legion. Acting
no longer on the defensive, they rushed on the attack. In the gates of
the camp, of which in every Roman one there were four, having distinct
names one on each side of the circumference, a fierce and obstinate
engagement followed. The
recently besieged legion and the forces, which came to their relief
fought with a spirit of emulation, the former observes the historian, to
prove that they stood in no need of assistance, the latter contending
for the honour of succouring the distressed.
The Caledonians were completely routed, and if the woods and
marshes had not favoured their escape this action might have finished
the war, and completely established the Roman power.
It is contended that this battle was fought at Lochore in Fife,
in the neighbourhood of Lochleven, where the appearance of a Roman camp
is still to be seen. The
form of this camp is described as resembling a square, but it is in many
parts levelled and defaced. South
of this camp there is a large morass, in which have been often dug up
the roots of different trees in such abundance as to indicate that it
was in ancient times covered with wood.
This therefore, is supposed to be the camp in which the ninth
legion was attacked. There
is near this locality the village of Blair, a word that signifies,
according to some interpreters of the ancient language, the spot where a
battle was fought, but General Roy refutes this idea.
The Caledonians, notwithstanding their defeat, were not
discouraged, and resolved to keep the field.
They enlisted their young men, sent their wives and children to
places of safety, and with solemn rites and sacrifices in their groves
they formed a league in the cause of liberty.
The campaign thus ended, and the contending armies retired into
winter quarters.
In the opening of the following campaign Agricola dispatched his
fleet, with orders to annoy the coast by frequent descents in several
places, and to spread a general terror. He placed himself at the head of
his army, and taking with him a band of Britons, on whose approved
fidelity he could fully rely, he advanced as far as the Grampian
mountains, where the Caledonians were posted under their renowned chief
Galgach or Galgacus. Thus
stupendous range, the Mons Grampius of Tacitus, extends across the
island from the district of Cowal in Argyleshire, on the Atlantic, to
Aberdeen on the German Ocean, whence they form another ridge in a
northwest direction, extending through Aberdeenshire to Moray and the
borders of Inverness-shire. The
scene of the battle between the Romans and the Caledonians is noticed in
the sequel, but it is still a subject of dispute among antiquarians, few
of who can agree on the precise locality, although the district can be
securely ascertained from the route of Agricola’s march.
Little is known of Galgacus the Caledonian chief.
He is called Galdus in the Chronicle of the Kings of Scotland,
and a learned writer gives is an account of the etymology of the name.
He maintains that the Romans from two Gaelic appellations-Gold
and Cachach latinized Galgacus; the first, Gauld being the proper name,
and the second a soubriquet, on account of the number of battles he
fought-a custom common among the Celtic septs. Thus, Graham of Claverhouse, the well known Viscount of
Dundee, was called Evan Du-nan-cach, or Black haired John who fights the
battles, and in a like manner the celebrated John Duke of Argyle was
known among the highlanders by the title of Evan Roy-nan-cach, or Red
haired John who fights battles. Tacitus
says that upwards of thirty thousand men appeared under the Caledonian
chief, and their numbers were continually increasing.
The youth of the country, and even the men in years whose vigour
was still unbroken, poured in from all quarters on this occasion, proud
of their past exploits, and the memorials of bravery they had earned by
their martial spirit.
Before the battle commenced Galgacus convened his soldiers around
him, eager for action, and excited by ardour.
The speech which Tacitus ascribes to him is a splendid piece of
eloquence, and is valuable as exhibiting a striking picture of Roman
oppression. It may be
doubted whether Galgacus spoke what the historian has put into his
mouth, but it is more than probable that he harangued his men, for in
those times no battle was fought without a speech from the general to
rouse and animate the valour of his army.
“We see the same custom,” says a translator of Tacitus,
“among the savages of America. In
our times few or no speeches are made at the head of the line.
The modern general has no occasion to be an orator; his artillery
speaks for him. But since
it is likely that Galgacus addressed his men, that probability is ground
sufficient for the historian; and Galgacus, then upon the point of a
decisive action, when all that was dear to him depended on the event,
may be fairly allowed to have addressed his men in substance at least,
if not in the manner represented. The
ferocity of a savage, whose bosom glowed with the love of liberty, gives
warmth and spirit to the whole speech.
Neither the Greek nor Roman page has anything to do with it.
The critics have admired the speech of Porus to Alexander the
Great, but excellent as it is, it shrinks and fades away before the
Caledonian orator. Even the
speech of Agricola, which follows immediately after it, is tame and
feeble, when opposed to the ardour, the impetuosity, and the vehemence,
of the Baltic chief. We see
Tacitus exerting all his art to decorate the character of his father in
law, but he had neither the same vein of sentiment, nor the same
generous love of liberty, to support the cause of an ambitious
conqueror. In the harangue
of Galgacus, the pleasure of the reader springs from two principles.
He admires the enthusiasm of the brave Cale Caledonian, and at
the same time applauds the noble historian, who draws up a charge
against the tyranny of his own countrymen, and generously enlists on the
side of liberty.”
Although the speech of Galgacus is well known, the present
narrative would be incomplete without this splendid burst of alleged
Caledonian eloquence, which many a schoolboy has been made to recite as
an elementary exercise. “When
I consider,” says Galgacus, “the motives which have roused us to
this war, when I reflect on the necessity which now demands our firmest
vigour, I expect everything great and noble from the union of sentiment
pervading us all. From this
day I date the freedom of Britain. We are the men who never crouched in bondage.
Beyond this spot there is no land where liberty can find a
refuge. Even the sea is
shut against us, while the Roman fleet is hovering on the coast.
To draw the sword in the cause of freedom is the true glory of
the brave, and in our condition cowardice itself would throw away the
scabbard. In the battles,
which have been hitherto fought with alternate vicissitudes of fortune,
our countrymen might well repose some hopes in us; they might consider
us as their last resource; they knew us to be the noblest sons of
Britain, placed in the last recesses of the land, in the very sanctuary
of liberty. We have not so
much as seen the melancholy regions where slavery has debased mankind.
We have lived in freedom, and our eyes have been unpolluted by
the sight of ignoble bondage.
“The extremity of the earth is ours.
Defended by our situation, we have to this day preserved our
honour and the rights of men. But
we are no longer safe in our obsecurity; our retreat is laid open; the
enemy rushes on and, as things unknown are ever magnified, he thinks a
mighty conquest lied before him. But
this is the end of the habitable world, and rocks and boisterous waves
fill all the space behind. The
Romans are in the heart of our country; no submission can satisfy their
pride; no concession can appease their fury.
While the land has anything left, it is the theatre of war; when
it can yield no more, they explore the seas for hidden treasure.
Are the nations rich? Roman
avarice is their enemy. Are
they poor? Roman ambition lords it over them. The East and the West have been rifled, and the spoiler is
still insatiate. The
Romans, by a strange singularity of nature, are the only people who
invade with equal ardour the wealth and the poverty of nations.
To rob, to ravage, and to murder, in their imposing language are
the arts of civil society. When
they have made the world a solitude they call it peace.”
After various allusions to the conduct of the Romans, and the
peculiar circumstances in which the Caledonians were places, Galgacus
continues “We know the manners of the Romans, and are we to imagine
that their valour in the field is equal to their arrogance in time of
peace? By our dissensions
their glory rises; the vices of their enemies are the negative virtues
of the Roman army, f that may be called an army which is no better than
a motley crew of various nations, held together by success, and ready to
crumble away in the first reverse of fortune.
That this will be their fate no one can doubt, unless we suppose
that the Gauls the Germans, and with shame I add, the Britons, a
mercenary band, who hire their blood in a foreign service, will adhere
from principle to a new master whom they have lately served and long
detested. They are now
enlisted by awe and terror; break their fetters, and the man who forgets
to fear will seek revenge.
“All that can inspire the human heart, every motive that can
excite us to deeds of valour, is on our side.
The Romans have no wives in the field to animate their drooping
spirit; no parents to reproach the want of courage.
They are not enlisted in the cause of their country; their
country, if they have any, lies at a distance.
They are a band of mercenaries, a wretched handful of devoted
men, who tremble and look aghast as they roll their eyes around, and see
on every side unknown objects. The
sky over their h